MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252248887 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1392-5_21

Comparative Energetics of Glucose and Xylose Metabolism in Recombinant Zymomonas mobilis

2000· book-chapter· en· W4252248887 on OpenAlexaff
Hugh G. Lawford, Joyce D. Rousseau

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2000
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZymomonas mobilisXyloseChemostatChemistrySugarBiochemistryL-GlucoseYield (engineering)EthanolFermentationBiologyEthanol fuelBacteriaBiotechnologyThermodynamicsInsulin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recombinant Zymomonas mobilis CP4:pZB5 was grown with pH control in batch and continuous modes with either glucose or xylose as the sole carbon and energy source. In batch cultures in which the ratio of the final cell mass concentration to the amount of sugar in the medium was constant (i.e., under conditions that promote “coupled growth”), maximum specific rates of glucose and xylose consumption were 8.5 and 2.1 g/(g of cell.h), respectively; maximum specific rates of ethanol production for glucose and xylose were 4.1 and 1.0 g/(g of cell.h), respectively; and average growth yields from glucose and xylose were 0.055 and 0.034 g of dry cell mass (DCM)/g of sugar, respectively. The corresponding value of γATp for glucose and xylose was 9.9 and 5.1 g of DCM/mol of ATP, respectively. γATp for the wild-type culture CP4 with glucose was 10.4 g of DCM/mol of ATP. For single substrate chemostat cultures in which the growth rate was varied as the dilution rate (D), the maximum or “true” growth yield (max γ x/s) was calculated from Pirt plots as the inverse of the slope of the best-fit linear regression for the specific sugar utilization rate as a function of D, and the “maintenance coefficient” (m) was determined as the y-axis intercept. For xylose, values of max γ and m were 0.0417 g of DCM/g of xylose (γATp = 6.25) and 0.04 g of xylose/(g of cell.h), respectively. However, with glucose there was an observed deviation from linearity, and the data in the Pirt plot was best fit with a second-order polynomial in D. At D > 0.1/h, γATP = 8.71 and m = 2.05 g of glu/(g of cell.h) whereas at D < 0.1/h, γ ATP, = 4.9 g of DCM/mol of ATP and m = 0.04 g of glu / (g of cell.h). This observation provides evidence to question the validity of the unstructured growth model and the assumption that Pirt’s maintenance coefficient is a constant that is independent of the growth rate. Collectively, these observations with individual sugars and the values assigned to various growth and fermentation parameters will be useful in the development of models to predict the behavior of rec Zm in mixed substrate fermentations of the type associated with biomass-to-ethanol processes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionFrench-language works237,207