MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4252332928 · doi:10.3410/f.732388947.793546084

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Structural Insights into Yeast Telomerase Recruitment to Telomeres.

2018· dataset· en· W4252332928 on OpenAlexaff
Susan P. Lees‐Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueFaculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · 2018
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersYouth Innovation Promotion AssociationNational Institutes of HealthYouth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of SciencesLigue Contre le CancerNational Institute of General Medical SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTelomereTelomeraseYeastComputational biologyCellular AgingBiologyGeneticsEvolutionary biologyDNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Telomerase maintains chromosome ends from humans to yeasts.Recruitment of yeast telomerase to telomeres occurs through its Ku and Est1 subunits, via independent interactions with telomerase RNA (TLC1) and telomeric proteins Sir4 and Cdc13, respectively.However, the structures of the molecules comprising these telomerase-recruiting pathways remain unknown.Here, we report crystal structures of the Ku heterodimer and Est1 complexed with their key binding partners.Two major findings are: (1) Ku specifically binds to telomerase RNA in a distinct, yet related, manner to how it binds DNA and (2) Est1 employs two separate pockets to bind distinct motifs of Cdc13.The N-terminal Cdc13-binding site of Est1 cooperates with the TLC1-Ku-Sir4 pathway for telomerase recruitment, whereas the C-terminal interface is dispensable for binding Est1 in vitro, yet is nevertheless essential for telomere maintenance in vivo.Overall, our results integrate previous models and provide fundamentally valuable structural information regarding telomere biology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1200.092

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFaculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature→Same topicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms→French-language works237,207→