Bibliographic record
Abstract
We evaluated the effect of vitamin C (Vit C) supplementation on the resistance of Megalobrama amblycephala to Aeromonas hydrophi1a infection under pH stress. Fish were randomly divided into six groups: a control group (fed with a basal diet) and five treatment groups (fed with basal diet supplemented with 33.4, 65.8, 133.7, 251.5 and 501.5 mg/kg Vit C, respectively). After 90 days, fish were exposed to combined stressors, first pH 9.5 followed by A. hydrophila infection. The results showed that 133.7 mg/kg vit C improved complement 4 (C4), anti-superoxide anion free aradical (ASAFER) and heat shock protein (HSP) 70 compared with the control group; and 251.5 mg/kg vit C enhanced complement 3 (C3), HSP60, HSP70 and HSP90 compared to the control group before stress. After pH stress and A. hydrophila infection, hemoglobin, ASAFER and HSP60, HSP70, HSP90 in the groups fed with 133.7 and 251.5 mg/kg vit C were still significantly higher, while serum cortisol in the group fed with 251.5 mg/kg vit C was lower compared to the control group 15 days after pH stress. The cumulative mortality of the control group was higher than that of the five treatment groups at 12, 24 h after A. hydrophila infection. The results of this study suggest that 133.7-251.5mg/kg vit C in a diet could have potential to stimulate immune response, and enhance resistance against high pH stress and A. hydrophila infection of Wuchang bream.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".