MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252568644 · doi:10.5539/ijsp.v8n3p114

Reviewer Acknowledgements for International Journal of Statistics and Probability, Vol. 8, No. 3

2019· article· en· W4252568644 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Wendy Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Statistics and Probability · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistics Education and Methodologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommonwealthLibrary scienceSociologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

International Journal of Statistics and Probability wishes to acknowledge the following individuals for their assistance with peer review of manuscripts for this issue. Their help and contributions in maintaining the quality of the journal is greatly appreciated. Many authors, regardless of whether International Journal of Statistics and Probability publishes their work, appreciate the helpful feedback provided by the reviewers. Reviewers for Volume 8, Number 3 Abdullah A. Smadi, Yarmouk University, Jordan Carla J. Thompson, University of West Florida, USA Carolyn Huston, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), Australia Faisal Khamis, Al Ain University of Science and Technology, Canada Felix Almendra-Arao, UPIITA del Instituto Politécnico Nacional , México Gane Samb Lo, University Gaston Berger, SENEGAL Gennaro Punzo, University of Naples Parthenope, Italy Gerardo Febres, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Venezuela Jacek Białek, University of Lodz, Poland Kassim S. Mwitondi, Sheffield Hallam University, UK Krishna K. Saha, Central Connecticut State University, USA Man Fung LO, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Marcelo Bourguignon, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil Mingao Yuan, North Dakota State University, USA Mohieddine Rahmouni, University of Tunis, Tunisia Nahid Sanjari Farsipour, Alzahra University, Iran Noha Youssef, American University in Cairo, Egypt Pablo José Moya Fernández, Universidad de Granada, Spain Philip Westgate, University of Kentucky, USA Shatrunjai Pratap Singh, John Hancock Financial Services, USA Sohair F. Higazi, University of Tanta, Egypt Vilda Purutcuoglu, Middle East Technical University (METU), Turkey Vyacheslav Abramov, Swinburne University of Technology, Australia Wei Zhang, The George Washington University, USA Zaixing Li, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), China Wendy Smith On behalf of, The Editorial Board of International Journal of Statistics and Probability Canadian Center of Science and Education

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.044
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.455
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Evaluation · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0440.455
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0100.006
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0080.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0810.050

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainEvaluation
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Statistics and ProbabilitySame topicStatistics Education and MethodologiesFrench-language works237,207