MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252648749 · doi:10.1386/eme.17.2.193_5

Book Reviews

2018· article· en· W4252648749 on OpenAlexaffabout
Karen Lollar, Thomas D. Zlatic, Robert K. Logan, Ron Jacobson, Ira Nayman, Arthur W. Hunt, Bill Petkanas

Bibliographic record

VenueExplorations in Media Ecology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedia, Religion, Digital Communication
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite (mutation)Art historyTheologyPhilosophyMedia studiesReligious studiesSociologyArtChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract More Sensible Thinking , Martin H. Levinson (2012) New York: Institute of General Semantics, 210 pp., ISBN: 9780982755969, p/bk, $15.95 Walter Ong’s Contributions to Cultural Studies: The Phenomenology of the Word and I-Thou Communication , Thomas J. Farrell (2015) Revised edition, with an introduction by Robert A. White and a new afterword and bibliography, New York: Hampton Press, 354 pp., ISBN: 981572739505, h/bk, $41.95 Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind , Yuval Noah Harari (2014) Toronto: Signal: McClelland & Stewart (Canada) (2015), New York: Harper Collins (US), 464 pp., ISBN-13: 9780062316097, h/bk, $35.00, ISBN-13: 9780062316110, p/bk, $22.99 Writing Myself into Existence: Notes on a Literary Life and Other Adventures , Arthur Asa Berger (2016) Seattle, WA: NeoPoiesis Press, 174 pp., ISBN: 9780990356561, p/bk, $16.95 McLuhan in an Age of Social Media , Paul Levinson Connected Editions, 63 pp., ISBN: 9781561780501, p/bk, $9.99 The Benedict Option: A Strategy for Christians in a Post-Christian Nation , Rod Dreher (2017) New York: Sentinel Press, 262 pp., ISBN: 9780735213296, h/bk, $25.00 Confronting Technopoly: Charting a Course Towards Human Survival , Phil Rose (ed.) (2017) Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 252 pp., ISBN: 9781783206889, p/bk, $100

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExplorations in Media EcologySame topicMedia, Religion, Digital CommunicationFrench-language works237,207