MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Editorial Board

2015· paratext· en· W4252708724 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in taxation · 2015
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicTaxation and Compliance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary sciencePublishingPolitical scienceManagementLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Citation (2015), "Editorial Board", Advances in Taxation (Advances in Taxation, Vol. 22), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. ix-x. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1058-749720150000022010 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2015 Emerald Group Publishing Limited John Hasseldine, Editor University of New Hampshire, USA Kenneth Anderson University of Tennessee, USA Bryan Cloyd Lehigh University, USA Anthony P. Curatola Drexel University, USA Charles Enis Pennsylvania State University, USA Pete Frischmann Oregon State University, USA Norman Gemmell Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand Peggy A. Hite Indiana University-Bloomington, USA Kevin Holland Cardiff University, UK Khondkar Karim University of Massachusetts Lowell, USA Beth B. Kern Indiana University-South Bend, USA Erich Kirchler University of Vienna, Austria Stephen Liedtka Villanova University, USA Alan Macnaughton University of Waterloo, Canada Amin Mawani York University, Canada Janet A. Meade University of Houston, USA Emer Mulligan National University of Ireland Galway, UK Lynne Oats University of Exeter, UK Grant Richardson University of Adelaide, Australia Robert Ricketts Texas Tech University, USA Michael L. Roberts University of Colorado-Denver, USA Timothy Rupert Northeastern University, USA David Ryan Temple University, USA Toby Stock Ohio University, USA Marty Wartick University of Northern Iowa, USA Christoph Watrin University of Muenster, Germany Book Chapters Advances in Taxation Advances in Taxation Advances in Taxation Copyright Page List of Contributors Editorial Board Introduction Procedural Justice for All: a Taxpayer Rights Analysis of Irs Earned Income Credit Compliance Strategy The Effect of Federal-State Conformity on Taxpayer Decisions Does College Savings Plan Performance Matter? The Effects of Jointly Provided Tax Services and Auditor Size on Restatements Inherent Outcome-Favorable Biases and Mitigating Effects of Principles-Based Standards: A Study of Accounting Students’ Tax Decisions The Effect of Detection Risk on Uncertain Tax Position Reporting: Experimental Evidence

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.737
Threshold uncertainty score0.880

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0170.007
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2630.271

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in taxationSame topicTaxation and Compliance StudiesFrench-language works237,207