Bibliographic record
Abstract
R.D. Gidney and W.P.J. Millar, How Schools Worked: Public Education in Canada, 1900–1940, reviewed by Paul Axelrod Bettina Bradbury, Wife to Widow: Lives, Laws, and Politics in Nineteenth-Century Montreal, reviewed by Lori Chambers John McLaren, Dewigged, Bothered, and Bewildered: British Colonial Judges on Trial, 1800–1900, reviewed by Patrick J. Connor Richard Feltoe, The Call to Arms: The 1812 Invasions of Upper Canada, reviewed by Wesley B. Turner Dorothy Duncan, Hoping for the Best, Preparing for the Worst: Everyday Life in Upper Canada, 1812–1814, reviewed by Catharine Anne Wilson Dan Azoulay, Hearts and Minds: Canadian Romance at the Dawn of the Modern Era, 1900–1930, reviewed by Dale Barbour Jocelyn Thorpe, Temagami's Tangled Wild: Race, Gender, and the Making of Canadian Nature, reviewed by Jodi Giesbrecht P.B. Waite, In Search of R.B. Bennett, reviewed by Larry A. Glassford Helen Forsey, Eugene Forsey: Canada's Maverick Sage, reviewed by Michiel Horn Michel S. Beaulieu, Labour at the Lakehead: Ethnicity, Socialism, and Politics, 1900–35, reviewed by Peter Campbell Edited by Howard White, A Hard Man to Beat: The Story of Bill White, Labour Leader, Historian, Shipyard Worker, Raconteur, reviewed by Andrew Parnaby Reg Whitaker, Gregory S. Kealey, and Andrew Parnaby, Secret Service: Political Policing in Canada from the Fenians to Fortress America, reviewed by Dennis Molinaro David Levy, Stalin's Man in Canada: Fred Rose and Soviet Espionage, reviewed by Reg Whitaker
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.376 | 0.363 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".