MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252723999 · doi:10.1149/ma2018-02/31/1059

(Invited) Composition and Strain Engineering of New Group-IV Thermoelectric Materials

2018· article· en· W4252723999 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Masashi Kurosawa, Yukihiro Imai, Taisei Iwahashi, Kouta Takahashi, Mitsuo Sakashita, Osamu Nakatsuka, Shigeaki Zaima

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceThermoelectric effectSeebeck coefficientEpitaxyMolecular beam epitaxyThermal conductivityWaferThermoelectric materialsFigure of meritDopingSubstrate (aquarium)OptoelectronicsElectrical resistivity and conductivityGermaniumSiliconLayer (electronics)NanotechnologyComposite materialElectrical engineeringThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sequential integration of thermoelectric generators (TEGs) on a silicon wafer is essential for next-generation electronics such as internet-of-things sensing network as an energy-harvesting device. A guideline of thermoelectric performance is defined as dimensionless figure of merit, zT = S 2 σT / κ , which is calculated from Seebeck coefficient ( S ), electrical conductivity ( σ ), thermal conductivity ( κ ), and absolute temperature ( T ). Germanium tin (Ge 1 − x Sn x ) binary alloys theoretically possess a low κ [1] and a high σ [2], implying that Ge 1 − x Sn x enables high-performance TEGs. In our previous study on the thermal conductivity of Ge 1 − x Sn x epitaxial layer grown on (001)-oriented Ge [3], it was revealed that a very low κ of 2.0 W/mK was obtained for a Ga-doped Ge 0.929 Sn 0.071 epitaxial layer. The value is at least 77 and 30 times lower than that for bulk-Si (156 W/mK) and bulk-Ge (60 W/mK) [4], respectively, and same order with that for amorphous Si (1−2 W/mK) [5]. However, thermoelectric properties of the epitaxial layers could not be clarified because the underlying substrates were not electrical insulators. It is therefore, in this study, we aim to reveal thermoelectric properties of Ge 1 − x Sn x epitaxial layers with a wide range of Sn contents grown by low-temperature molecular beam epitaxy. Here, semi-insulating wafers of Si, GaAs, and InP were used as a substrate in order to isolate electrically from the substrates. Combined with the results for the polycrystalline films, we will establish a guideline for enhancing the zT value in narrow band-gap group-IV materials. Acknowledgments: This work was partially supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S) (Grant No. 26220605) and Young Scientists (A) (Grant No. 17H04919) from JSPS in Japan and PRESTO (Grant No. JPMJPR15R2) from JST in Japan. References: [1] S. N. Khatami and Z. Aksamiji, Phys. Rev. Appl. 6 , 014015 (2016). [2] K. L. Low et al. , J. Appl. Phys. 112 , 103715 (2012). [3] M. Kurosawa et al. , “Thermophysical characterizations of Ge 1 − x Sn x epitaxial layers aiming for thermoelectric device,” 9th International Conference on Silicon Epitaxy and Hetero-structures (ICSI-9), Montreal, Canada, 4.4.1, May 21, (2015). [4] C. J. Glassbrenner and G. A. Slack, Phys. Rev. 134 , A1058 (1964). [5] D. G. Cahill et al. , J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 7 , 1259 (1989).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and DevicesFrench-language works237,207