MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252727676 · doi:10.2118/115205-ms

New Steel Tooth Cutting Structure Breaks Multiple Records in Australasia

2008· article· en· W4252727676 on OpenAlex
Steve Bunton, Natalie Sim, Bobby Grimes

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsApache (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBit (key)DrillingEngineeringComputer scienceMechanical engineeringStructural engineeringEngineering drawing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Approximately 90% of the large diameter holes in Australasia (Indonesia, Australia, PNG and New Zealand) are drilled with steel tooth roller cone bits. A new steel tooth bit design has proven to significantly improve the drilling economics in these applications. This paper describes the drilling challenges posed by these applications, details the new bit design features, and presents case studies showing the performance improvements these new bits provide when compared with conventional steel tooth bits. The new design bits feature a novel cutting structure with pyramid-shaped teeth, additional rows of teeth, wide grooves between rows, anti-tracking row(s) with tight pitches, thick hardfacing deposits, and a bar trimmer type gauge design. The result is a steel tooth bit that delivers significantly higher ROP and longer life than current designs, with high reliability, and predictable steering behavior for directional applications. Hole sections can often be completed with fewer bits, which further improves drilling economics. These bits achieve ROPs faster than even that of large diameter PDC bits in the Australasian applications, thus the reason that steel tooth bits are primarily used. An operator in Balikpapan, Indonesia drilled a long S-shaped hole with a new 17 1/2-in. steel tooth bit at 40% higher ROP than the best of nine direct offsets that were drilled with conventional steel tooth bits. Another operator offshore Western Australia conducted a head-to-head comparison of a new 16-in. steel tooth bit against a conventional steel tooth bit in identical hole sections. The new bit drilled over 70% faster and over 25% farther than the regular bit. A third operator in the Northwest Shelf area off Western Australia employed a new 17 ½-in. steel tooth bit to complete a section normally drilled with 12 ¼-in. PDC bits. The new steel tooth bit drilled over 25% faster than the fastest PDC offset run. Additional case studies will be presented further documenting these positive field results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.591
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it