Molar Pregnancy and Poor Obstetrics Outcome: Retrospective Evaluation of Six Cases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this case series, we aimed to determine obstetrical history features of our patients who had experienced hydatidiform mole in their previous pregnancies. There were two patients who had heterozygous mutation for methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) enzyme. One patient had both factor V Leiden and methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase enzyme heterozygous mutation. Excluding hydatidiform mole pregnancies, these six patients had 17 pregnancies totally. Eleven pregnancies (64.7%) experienced obstetrical/perinatal complications during their pregnancies. The most common complications were miscarriage, anomalous fetus, and mental retarded child. In conclusion, we advise obstetricians to be careful when their patients experienced hydatidiform mole in their previous pregnancies. J Med Cases. 2016;7(6):239-241 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jmc2495w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".