MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252752920 · doi:10.1038/sj.labinvest.3700569

Cytopathology

2007· article· en· W4252752920 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Akalin, Di Lu, David L. Eaton, Anne C. Larkin, Andrew H. Fischer, Israh Akhtar, Michael D. Hughson, Anwer Siddiqi, Richard Flowers, Mubarak Al‐Shraim, William R. Geddie, W Al-Za'abi, Sl Geddie, Monther Alsharif, Klint Kjeldahl, Catherine Curran, С. В. Миллер, Ronald Balassanian, Rajiv Dhir, Colleen M. Vrbin, Stephen S. Raab, Anil V. Parwani

Bibliographic record

VenueLaboratory Investigation · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCytopathologyMedicinePathologyCytology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cell blocks provide diagnostic architectural information that complements smears or monolayers. On-site evaluation (OSE) of breast FNAs makes the on-site assessed material unavailable for a cell block. We previously found that a new "rapid cell block" technique is highly efficient at recovering sparse material, and improves diagnosis by frequently permitting diagnosis of invasion in FNAs of breast cancers or allowing accurate histologic grading of proliferative lesions. We tested the hypothesis that one monolayer slide and a rapid cell block without OSE would outperform OSE with multiple smears and a conventional cell block for ultrasound-guided breast FNAs. Design: Due to relocation of Pathology in October 2005, we stopped performing OSE for breast FNAs. Instead, the same mammographers performed two passes, with additional passes if needle rinses showed no particles in the needle rinse. Rapid cell blocks were made after a ThinPrep. We examined the outcome of 134 consecutive non-cyst FNAs without OSE from October 2005 to April 2006, and compared them to 119 consecutive non-cyst FNAs from 200 that had OSE and a conventional (collodion bag) cell block only when there was a visible pellet after centrifugation. Results: In the OSE cohort, 1.4 OSEs were performed per case, and sufficient material remained in 25% for a cell block, though with generally sparse cellularity. 13% of OSE FNAs were "Unsatisfactory for diagnosis" compared to 11% in the cohort without OSE. The rates of "gray-zone" diagnoses (atypical plus suspicious) were 19% with OSE and 11% without OSE (p< .1). 6/19 atypical FNAs with OSE had cancer at follow-up compared to only 1/13 atypical FNA without OSE (a case without a rapid cell block). Neither cohort had false positive diagnoses, or cancers if the FNA was negative. Time per OSE was estimated at 25 minutes for pathologists and 15 minutes (extra) for mammographers for a savings of 35 and 21 minutes per case, respectively. At Medicare reimbursement rates for OSE and cell blocks, the cost per patient was reduced by $8. Conclusions: Our results suggest that replacing OSE with efficient cell blocks can provide more clear-cut results, while saving time for pathologists and clinicians, and saving health care dollars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.322
Threshold uncertainty score0.806

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaboratory InvestigationSame topicCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchFrench-language works237,207