MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252771364 · doi:10.14740/jmc1998w

Remnant Gastric Perforation at a Patient With Colon Interposition: A Rare Case

2014· article· en· W4252771364 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Varlık Erol, Levent Uğurlu, Mutlu Ünver, Şafak Öztürk, Gökhan Akbulut, Cengiz Aydın

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEsophageal and GI Pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerforationEsophagusSurgeryStomachAbdomenCaustic (mathematics)General surgeryGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of performing surgical treatment after benign or maligned pathologies of the esophagus is to provide the continuity of the intestinal system. Especially after caustic esophagus injuries mostly colon interposition is performed to provide continuity. In this case study was made to determine actions to be taken for follow-up and as a treatment method for patients developing remnant perforation at the stomach after a colon interposition. A 53-year-old female patient came with complaint of abdominal pain for 2 days. Anamnesis showed that left colon interposition was performed because of esophagus stricture development after she drank caustic substance about 10 years ago. After acute abdominal findings during the physical examination, a direct abdominal graphy was made while standing and the X-ray of the lungs showed free air in the inner abdomen, together with findings of perforation at the computed tomography (CT), and it was decided to perform an urgent surgical intervention. During the exploration a perforation of approximately 1 cm was determined on the front side of the remnant gastric antrum. The perforation was sutured primarily with 2/0 silk. Postoperative on the fourth day, the oral intake of the patient was opened which is tolerated and the patient was discharged on day 7 after surgery. If no results are obtained from the endoscopic dilatation methods performed on patients developing stricture after caustic esophagus and stomach injuries, the most appropriate method to provide the continuity of the intestinal system is a left colon interposition, which has got perfect long-term results. Although especially complications of the remnant organ are rarely seen, regarding cases with acute abdominal examination findings besides complications belonging to the colon graft, the remnant organ’s pathologies must be kept in mind and exploration must be performed with caution. J Med Cases. 2015;6(1):43-45 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jmc1998w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0070.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicEsophageal and GI PathologyFrench-language works237,207