MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252922495 · doi:10.18260/1-2--32405

Board 68: Work in Progress: LabSim: An Ancillary Simulation Environment for Teaching Power Electronics Fundamentals

2020· article· en· W4252922495 on OpenAlex
Mohamed Elshazly, Hamid Timorabadi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExperimental Learning in Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaceConvertersPower electronicsElectronicsSoftwareComputer scienceClass (philosophy)CurriculumPower (physics)Mode (computer interface)Computer engineeringElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringEngineering managementEngineeringHuman–computer interactionArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Switch-mode power conversion is one of the most crucial topics in a modern undergraduate electrical energy systems curriculum. The importance and ubiquity of switch-mode power converters, however, are matched by their complexity. Students are expected to have developed a rigorous understanding of electrical circuits, semiconductor physics, signal processing, control theory, digital logic, and wave mathematics before being introduced to power electronics. Students at our institution are introduced to fundamental concepts in lectures then they put them into practice in hands-on labs, which are limited to three-hour-long experiments conducted in a strictly controlled environment due to safety concerns. This leaves little room for exploration and independent trial-and-error. We have developed LabSim, an out-of-the-box functional software implementation of the switch-mode converters studied in class, in order to provide students with the opportunity to practically explore power electronics fundamentals and experiment at their own pace. LabSim is implemented in Simulink using visual PLECS blocks, an approach that ensures students do not have to spend significant time learning new software or navigating complex mathematical models. A pilot run of LabSim was conducted over the course of a semester, with students being provided the models in pace with the relevant lecture and lab material. We present a detailed description of the LabSim implementation and the specific shortcomings it aims to address within our introductory power electronics course. We also present and analyze the positive results of the LabSim pilot project as indicated by a student survey emphasising learning impact and workload management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score0.873

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicExperimental Learning in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207