MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Editorial introductions

2005· article· en· W4253051371 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Nephrology & Hypertension · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicContemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension was launched in 1992. It is one of a successful series of review journals whose unique format is designed to provide a systematic and critical assessment of the literature as presented in the many primary journals. The field of nephrology and hypertension is divided into 12 sections that are reviewed once a year. Each section is assigned a Section Editor, a leading authority in the area, who identifies the most important topics at that time. Here we are pleased to introduce the Section Editors for this issue. Section Editors Robert D Toto, MDFigure 1Dr. Toto is a Professor of Medicine and Director of Clinical Nephrology and Patient-Oriented Research at The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. He is nationally and internationally known for his clinical research, teaching, and organizational skills. He is deeply involved in training programs in patient oriented research in general and in chronic kidney disease (CKD) in particular. Dr. Toto's research interests include detection, prevention and treatment of common progressive kidney diseases such as diabetes and hypertension. He has extensive experience in the care and management of patients with these diseases as well as conducting research in this area. In addition he is interested in mechanisms of dyslipidemia and hypertension in patients with CKD. He has been a principal investigator in major clinical trials of CKD prevention including the African-American Study of Kidney Disease (AASK trial), the HEMO study and the RENAAL trial. Rhian M TouyzFigure 2Dr Touyz, BSc(Hons), MBBCh, MSc(Med), PhD, is an Associate Professor of Medicine at the University of Montreal, Staff Scientist in the Laboratory of Experimental Hypertension at the Clinical Research Institute of Montreal (IRCM) and Physician in the Hypertension Clinic at the IRCM. Dr Touyz received her medical training and subsequent degrees from the University of the Wiwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. Her post-doctoral fellowship was completed at the Clinical Research Institute of Montreal. She has received numerous academic and research awards, including the Young Investigator Awards from the American Society of Hypertension, Canadian Society of Hypertension and the Quebec Society of Hypertension as well as being a finalist for the Irving H Page Award, Atherosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology from the American Heart Association. She is a Fellow of the American Heart Association (Council for High Blood Pressure). Dr Touyz was recently awarded the Lewis K Dahl Memorial Lecture Award by the Council for High Blood Pressure, American Heart Association, in recognition of her contributions to hypertension research. Dr Touyz chairs the Subcommittee on “Lifestyle Modifications” is co-chair of the Evidence-Based Recommendations Task Force and is on the Executive Committee of the Canadian Hypertension Education Program (CHEP). She is also the Scientific Chair of the Canadian Hypertension Society. She is funded by grants from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Fonds de la recherche en sante du quebec and has recently been awarded the Canada Research Chair in Hypertension at the University of Ottawa/Ottawa Health Research Institute. In addition she is on the editorial board of Hypertension, Magnesium, Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension, American Journal of Physiology and Clinical Science. Dr Touyz is author of more than 150 publications in the field. Her areas of research include clinical and experimental hypertension, signal transduction, oxidative stress, ion transport, vascular remodeling, insulin resistance and diabetes. She is particularly interested in translational research in hypertension, bridging the chasm between bench and bedside.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.386
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Nephrology & HypertensionSame topicContemporary Sociological Theory and PracticeFrench-language works237,207