MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4253086708 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckw169.087

6.D. Pitch presentations: Ottawa and beyond: health promotion

2016· article· en· W4253086708 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPublic Health Policies and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth promotionMedicineNursingPublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ProblemNon communicable diseases (NCD) are leading cause of morbidity and premature death in Croatia.Main risk factors are irregular eating habits, inappropriate physical activity and high blood pressure.35% of females and 48% males in adult population have excessive body weight, and 15% of females and 31% of males are obese.Only 17,1% males and 4,3% females are physically active. Description of the problemCroatian Ministry of Health and Croatian Institute of Public Health have initiated National Program of health promotion "Living Healthy''.Croatian government has adopted this Program as a model of comprehensive intervention with the aim of decreasing behavioral, biomedical and sociomedical risks for NCDs.Program consists of 5 components: health education, physical activity, health and nutrition, health and working place and health and environment, with the goal of comprehensive prevention and inclusion of all age groups in all settings.Program is implemented through 21 county public health institutes in collaboration with local authority and civil society. ResultsHealth education, as component of National Program has become a part of school curriculum; in 120 primary schools in Croatia that do not have sport gyms are introduced polygons for training through Program; paths for walking are established in 8 counties, 4 companies get the title ''Heathy Company'' for promoting health in the workplace, criteria for the food labeling with the pledge 'Living healthy' for the food with higher nutritional have been established, guidelines for

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.565

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0160.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1690.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public Health→Same topicPublic Health Policies and Education→French-language works237,207→