Effect of dietary cardiac glycosides on blood pressure regulation in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To investigate the possible physiological significance of dietary cardiac glycosides in blood pressure regulation, the blood pressure of normal Sprague Dawley rats raised on a regular diet, which naturally contains large amounts of Na + -pump inhibitors, was compared with that of rats on a purified synthetic diet, which contains no Na + -pump specific inhibitors, and with that of rats on a synthetic diet supplemented with 10 µg·mL -1 ouabain or 10 µg·mL -1 convallatoxin in the drinking water. After 6 weeks on the synthetic diet, the systolic blood pressure in the synthetic diet group was significantly elevated (145 ± 5 vs. 128 ± 4 mmHg, P < 0.05). At 10 weeks it reached a plateau (154 ± 3 vs. 122 ± 3 mmHg, P < 0.05). Plasma renin activity and Na + level were significantly higher in animals fed synthetic diets than in the regular diet group (P < 0.01). Administration of either losartan or lisinopril or a switch to a low salt synthetic diet (0.03% sodium) normalized the synthetic diet-induced high blood pressure. Supplementation of the synthetic diet with the cardiac glycosides delayed the onset of the increase in blood pressure for 4 weeks. Plasma aldosterone levels were approximately doubled in the cardiac glycoside-treated groups. Higher plasma Na + levels and hematocrit values present in the synthetic diet group were normalized by the glycoside supplements. These results suggest that supplemental dietary cardiac glycosides exert bidirectional effects on blood pressure regulation through actions that modulate extracellular fluid and electrolyte balance.Key words: cardiac glycosides, convallatoxin, ouabain, ouabain-like substance, purified synthetic diet, high blood pressure, renin-angiotensin system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".