Near‐Surface Seismic Studies to Estimate Potential Earthquake Ground Motion Amplification at a Thick Soil Site in the Ottawa River Valley, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PreviousNext No AccessSymposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2001Near‐Surface Seismic Studies to Estimate Potential Earthquake Ground Motion Amplification at a Thick Soil Site in the Ottawa River Valley, CanadaAuthors: Beatriz BenjumeaJim A. HunterSusan E. PullanRobert A. BurnsRon L. GoodBeatriz BenjumeaGeological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Jim A. HunterGeological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Susan E. PullanGeological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Robert A. BurnsGeological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, and Ron L. GoodGeological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canadahttps://doi.org/10.4133/1.2922948 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract Introductory paragraph for this paper is available only in the PDF and GZipped PS filesPermalink: https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2922948FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByCharacterization of site effects in Montreal, Canada1 July 2008 | Natural Hazards, Vol. 48, No. 2Surface and downhole shear wave seismic methods for thick soil site investigationsSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 9-12 Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2001ISSN (online):1554-8015Copyright: 2001 Pages: publication data© 2001 Copyright © 2001 The Environmental and Engineering Geophysical SocietyPublisher:Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society HistoryPublished: 30 Sep 2008 CITATION INFORMATION Beatriz Benjumea, Jim A. Hunter, Susan E. Pullan, Robert A. Burns, and Ron L. Good, (2001), "Near‐Surface Seismic Studies to Estimate Potential Earthquake Ground Motion Amplification at a Thick Soil Site in the Ottawa River Valley, Canada," Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems Proceedings : SSI6-SSI6. https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2922948 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".