MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253352817 · doi:10.1017/s1574019617000384

ECL volume 13 issue 4 Cover and Front matter

2017· article· en· W4253352817 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Dagmar Schiek, Mathias Tiedemann Svendsen, Menelaos Markakis, Joris Larik, Stéphanie Hennette-Vauchez, Pietro Faraguna, Dacian C. Dragoş, Bogdana Neamţu, Ben Crum, Graham Butler, Matteo Bonelli, Sergio Bartole, Ali İhsan Acar, L.F.M. Besselink, Mónica Claes, Jan-Herman Reestman, John Sap, Jan Komárek, G. van der Schyff, Mattias Wendel, Aida Torres Pérez

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Constitutional Law Review · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTaxation and Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversiteit van AmsterdamEuropean University InstituteEuropean CommissionUniversiteit MaastrichtYork University
KeywordsFront coverCover (algebra)Front (military)Volume (thermodynamics)Content (measure theory)Action (physics)Political scienceGeographyEngineeringPhysicsMeteorologyMathematicsMechanical engineeringThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

European perspectives on its continuing importance; the concept of unconstitutional constitutional amendments; Social Europe: Th e EU internal market and the Charter of Fundamental Rights; Th e relationship between economic freedoms and social rights; European Union: Th e European Ombudsman and freedom of information; Constitutional crises in Hungary and Poland; Court of Justice of the European Union: Judicial review in the area of the Common Foreign and Security Policy; Headscarves and religious discrimination; Denmark: Th e transfer of executive power to private entities and its constitutional limits; France: Th e CETA Agreement before the Conseil Constitutionnel; Italy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.280

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8040.764

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Constitutional Law ReviewSame topicTaxation and Legal IssuesFrench-language works237,207