MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253401205 · doi:10.2118/2004-132

Best Method to Balance Torque Loadings on a Pumping Unit Gearbox

2004· article· en· W4253401205 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
O.L. Rowlan, J.N. McCoy, A.L. Podio

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOil and Gas Production Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationTorqueUnit (ring theory)Balance (ability)Computer scienceSearch engineOperations researchEngineeringInformation retrievalLibrary scienceMathematicsPhysicsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In general there are three methods available to the operator to determine the net torque loadings on a pumping unit's gearbox. Two dynamic methods determine the instantaneous torque throughout the pumping cycle: method 1) Combines the measured surface dynamometer card and calculated torque factors together with measured or calculated counterbalance moments from the crank and weights and method 2) uses measured motor power with motor and drive efficiencies and the pumping unit speed to determine gearbox torque. Performing a counter balance effect, CBE, test is a direct method of determining net gearbox torque at a specific crank position to estimate the counterbalance moment; this static test is where the cranks and counter weights are held level until no upward or downward movement is noticed when the break is released. Field case studies of applying all three methods to determining gearbox torque are presented in this paper. The pros and cons of using each method are discussed. Introduction The oldest and most common method of artificial lift used for producing oil wells is sucker rod pumping. In the United States and Canada sucker rod lift is used in over 85% of artificial lift wells. The sucker rod lift system is made up of four components 1) prime mover, 2) pumping unit, 3) counterbalance to the rod loading, and 4) sucker rods and associated downhole equipment. The function of the pumping unit is to change the rotating motion of the prime mover into the vertical up and down linear pumping motion at the polished rod. The role of the prime mover is to furnish the necessary power to drive the system. In a sucker rod pumping system, the polished rod work needed to lift the fluid column is required only during the upstroke. If the sucker rod load on the surface pumping equipment were not counterbalanced, then the total work required from the prime mover would be performed during the upstroke lifting the buoyed sucker rod load and fluid load. During the downstroke the prime mover would not be doing any work, while the force of gravity pulls the rods and pump back down to the bottom of the stroke. Operating in this inefficient manner would require an extremely powerful prime mover and gearbox. For this inefficient system, the uncounterbalanced sucker rod load would determine the torque on the gearbox. To improve the efficiency and to reduce the size of the prime mover and gearbox, plus to load the gearbox more uniformly, the sucker rod pumping system is furnished with some type of counterbalance system, where the counterbalance load effect at the polished rod is approximately equal to the buoyant weight of the rods plus half the weight of the fluid load on the plunger. The effect of the "correct" counterbalance required to equally balance the peak upstroke and down stroke torque loads on the gearbox, when measured as a load at the polished rod, is approximately equal to the weight of the rods floating in fluid plus 1/2 the fluid load.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian International Petroleum ConferenceSame topicOil and Gas Production TechniquesFrench-language works237,207