Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2010), "List of Contributors", Wood, D.C. (Ed.) Economic Action in Theory and Practice: Anthropological Investigations (Research in Economic Anthropology, Vol. 30), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. xi-xii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0190-1281(2010)0000030002 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2010, Emerald Group Publishing Limited Book Chapters Research in Economic Anthropology Economic Action in Theory and Practice: Anthropological Investigations Copyright page Dedication List of Contributors Introduction Borrowed places: Eviction wars and property rights formalization in Kazakhstan Resolving the problem of inequity in the distribution of wealth in Brazil: Approaches derived from the Infante Dom Pedro of Portugal, Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and Louis Kelso Is Joseph Schumpeter's theory of economic development still useful? The case of a semirural community in Colombia Compadrazgo networks and immigrant adaptation in a Nevada town The domestic economy and its implications for social complexity: Spondylus craft production in coastal Ecuador an investigation into donkeys and donkey trading in Kashgar, Xinjiang, ChinaDonkey bazaar, a bazaar of hell: Urban food provisioning in Cameroon: Regional banana plantain networks linking Yaounde and the villages of Koumou and Oban Hostile worlds and questionable speculation: Recognizing the plurality of views about art and the market Agents of hybridity: Class, culture brokers, and the entrepreneurial imagination in cosmopolitan Cairo Early markets and the market cross Shifting transactional identities: Bazaar-style trade and risk management in the prestige economy of the Gabor Roma (Romania) Reverse osmosis and a can of beans: An ethnographic study of Latin American immigrant shoppers in Nashville, Tennessee Working hard and staying safe: Drilling rig hands in Alberta Book review: Market and society: The great transformation today (Chris Hann and Keith Hart, Eds.)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.778 | 0.771 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".