Bibliographic record
Abstract
Professions in the European Union (EU) have faced significant and radical challenges since the beginning of the 1980s. The sources of such challenges are multiple and can be found at the macro, meso and micro levels. At the macro level it is undeniable that the advanced capitalism trajectory has permeated social institutions, which are framed by a new economic rationality that also reaches public institutions (Polanyi 2001; Dardot & Laval 2010; Ward 2012). The spread of this rationality throughout the public sector was supported by the criticism against welfare state ‘interventionism’ developed by Public Choice Theory. For instance, Hayek (2001) defends that welfare state politics produce a lack of consumer-informed choices, social and economic inefficiency, and, particularly, dependency on professionals’ collective and individual corporatist self-interests. However, other authors, such as Foucault, sustain that what is at a stake is a real ‘anthropological project’ (Foucault 2004) that intends to align ‘minds’ and ‘markets’. This means that changes in the welfare state may not be restricted only to its institutions, but are expected to transform individual and collective systems of beliefs and values, as well as ways of interpreting society’s organisation and function (Fournier 1999). In fact, the traditional notions of citizen rights, collectivised well-being, and social responsibilities and socialised risk (Ward 2012) have been presented in some countries’ public systems as outdated values that used to characterise ‘modernity’ but are not adequate for modern times.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.273 | 0.105 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".