Index
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A censorship chronicle incorporating information from Agence France-Press (AFP), Allafrica. com, Alliance of Independent journalists (AJI), Amnesty International (AI), Arab Press Freedom Watch (APFW), Article 19 (A19), Association of Independent Electronic Media (ANEM), the BBC Monitoring Service Summary of World Broadcasts (SWB), Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Studies (CEHURDES), Centre for journalism in Extreme Situations (CJES), the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), Canadian Journalists for Free Expression (CJFE), Democratic Journalists ' League OlitHI), Freedom House, Global Internet Liberty Campaign (GILC),Human Rights Watch (HRW), Inter American Press Association (IAPA), Indy- media, Institutefor War & Peace Reporting (IWPR), Instituto de Prensa y Sociedad (IPYS), the United Nations Integrated Regional Information Network (IRIN), the International Federation of Journalists (IFJlFIP), Journaliste en danger (JED), International Press Institute (IPI), the Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA), Network for the Defence of Independent Media in Africa (NDIMA), Network for Education and Academic Rights (NEAR), International PEN (PEN), Pacific Islands News Association (PINA), Pacific Media Watch, Periodistas Frente La Corrupcion (PFC); Press Freedom Foundation (FLIP), Radio Free EuropelRadio Liberty (RFE/ RL), Reporters Saris Frontieres (RSF), Southeast Media Organisation (SEEMO), Statewatch, Transitions Online (TOL), World Association of Newspapers (WAN), World Press Freedom Committee (WPFC), and other sources including members of the International Freedom of Expression eXchange (IFEX).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.060 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it