Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviewed by: Encounter by Brittany Luby Deborah Stevenson, Editor Luby, Brittany Encounter; illus. by Michaela Goade. Little, 2019 [38p] Trade ed. ISBN 978-0-316-44918-2 $18.99 E-book ed. ISBN 978-0-316-44914-4 $9.99 Reviewed from galleys M 6-9 yrs On what's now known as the east Canadian coast, a young man, Fisher, awakes; on an explorer's ship in the north Atlantic, a young man, Sailor, greets the day. They're stunned to encounter each other ("Perhaps these lands are not so new," thinks Sailor), yet they negotiate past language differences to share food and enjoy a cooling swim together. They part friends, each hoping to see the other again. This northern first encounter story makes a complement to the better-known Caribbean accounts of European arrival, and the folkloric flavor of the storytelling is engaging. However, it's a startlingly idyllic approach to a first encounter story (a mood enhanced by Goade's starry, watercolor-dappled pastoral scenes). Luby, herself of Anishinaabe descent, states in her concluding note that she means to demonstrate that even kindly people like Sailor could be participants in oppressive systems, but [End Page 130] that message is completely absent from the main text, and the implied audience is unlikely to bring the necessary knowledge for dramatic irony. As a result, the book struggles to find a valid use: it requires considerable adult external context to provide a corrective, and the arcadian impression of the story will either overbalance subsequent explanation or be belied by it. Nonetheless, this could be a way to discuss non-Columbian North American exploration while keeping the continent's existing residents at the forefront. Copyright © 2019 The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it