MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253684707 · doi:10.1002/ange.201607281

Rotationally Active Ligands: Dialing‐Up the Co‐conformations of a [2]Rotaxane for Metal Ion Binding

2016· article· en· W4253684707 on OpenAlexafffund
Giorgio Baggi, Stephen J. Loeb

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSupramolecular Chemistry and Complexes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRotaxaneLigand (biochemistry)ChemistryChelationDenticityMetalEtherCrystallographyCrown etherMetal ions in aqueous solutionStereochemistryBite angleIonSupramolecular chemistryCrystal structureInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A novel [2]rotaxane was constructed that has a bidentate N,N′‐chelate as part of a rigid, H‐shaped axle and a 24‐membered crown ether macrocycle containing six ether O‐atoms and an olefinic group as the wheel. This unique topology produces a ligand with the ability to dial‐up different donor sets for complexation to metal ions by simply rotating the wheel about the axle. The solution and solid‐state structures of the free ligand and complexes with Li + and Cu + show how the ligand adopts different rotational co‐conformations for each. The Li + ion uses the N,N′‐chelate and O‐donors while the Cu + center is coordinated to both O‐donors and the olefinic group. This concept of rotationally active ligands should be possible with a wide variety of donor sets and could find broad application in areas of coordination chemistry, such as catalysis and metal sequestration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.534

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte ChemieSame topicSupramolecular Chemistry and ComplexesFrench-language works237,207