Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2016), "Editorial Advisory Board", The University Under Pressure (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 46), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. xi-xii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20160000046019 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2016 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. SERIES EDITORS Michael Lounsbury Associate Dean of Research Thornton A. Graham Chair University of Alberta School of Business, Alberta, Canada ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERS Howard E. Aldrich University of North Carolina, USA Stephen R. Barley Stanford University, USA Nicole Biggart University of California at Davis, USA Elisabeth S. Clemens University of Chicago, USA Jeannette Colyvas Northwestern University, USA Barbara Czarniawska Göteborg University, Sweden Gerald F. Davis University of Michigan, USA Marie-Laure Djelic ESSEC Business School, France Frank R. Dobbin Harvard University, USA Royston Greenwood University of Alberta, Canada Mauro Guillen The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, USA Paul M. Hirsch Northwestern University, USA Brayden G. King Northwestern University, USA Renate Meyer Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, Austria Mark Mizruchi University of Michigan, USA Walter W. Powell Stanford University, USA Hayagreeva Rao Stanford University, USA Marc Schneiberg Reed College, USA W. Richard Scott Stanford University, USA Haridimos Tsoukas ALBA, Greece Book Chapters The University under Pressure Research in the Sociology of Organizations The University Under Pressure Copyright Page List of Contributors Editorial Advisory Board Introduction: The University under Pressure Part I: The University Under Pressure – An Overview The Changing Ecology of U.S. Higher Education: An Organization Field Perspective Nested Organizational Fields: Isomorphism and Differentiation among European Universities Part II: Pressures at the Field Level The Emergent Action Field of Metrics: From Rankings to Altmetrics Student Loans as a Pressure on U.S. Higher Education Mapping the Network of North American Colleges and Universities: A New Approach to Empirically Derived Classifications Codes of Commerce and Codes of Citizenship: A Historical Look at Students as Consumers within us Higher Education Part III: Impacts on the Organization The Changing Finances of Public Higher Education Organizations: Diversity, Change, and Discontinuity Reconciling the Small Effect of Rankings on University Performance with the Transformational Cost of Conformity Universities, Academic Careers, and the Valorization of ‘Shiny Things’ Going Interdisciplinary in French and US Universities: Organizational Change and University Policies Draw Me a University: Organizational Design Processes in University Mergers Selling Students: The Rise of Corporate Partnership Programs in University Career Centers Part IV: What Future for the University? UC Berkeley’s Adaptations to the Crisis of Public Higher Education in the U.S.: Privatization? Commercialization? or Hybridization? This Time It Really May Be Different Two Continents Divided by the Same Trends? Reflections about Marketization, Competition, and Inequality in European Higher Education About the Authors
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.051 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".