MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253811138 · doi:10.7202/1040514ar

Résumés des affiches scientifiques

2017· article· fr· W4253811138 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Stephane Barriault, Aee Soares, Éric Lucas, Oumar Bashir, Jérôme P. Claverie, Pierre Lemoyne, Charles Vincent, Stéphanie Beauseigle, P Ontchangalt, A Billong, S Kerner, Y Rudolph-Binette, Agathe Vialle, J. Bernardo-Santos, Geneviève Labrie, Anaïs Boa, Eric Guerra-Grenier, Michele R. Warmund, P Castro-Grillo, Colin Favret

Bibliographic record

VenuePhytoprotection · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsGrain Research CentreArbressence (Canada)Cégep Saint-Jean-sur-RichelieuUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité du Québec à MontréalAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaBiopterreUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le chamaemyide annel, Leucopis annulipes, est un prdateur furtif aphidiphage indigne au Qubec qui vit au contact des colonies de pucerons qui lui servent de proies. Bien que cette espce soit encore largement mconnue, des rsultats prliminaires indiquent un potentiel en tant qu'agent de lutte biologique contre les pucerons. L'objectif du prsent travail tait de dterminer les taux de mortalit des trois stades immatures (oeuf, larve et nymphe) ainsi que la longvit des adultes de L. annulipes en laboratoire, puis de les comparer avec ceux de la ccidomyie du puceron, Aphidoletes aphidimyza, un autre prdateur furtif aphidiphage utilis commercialement et utilis en lutte biologique. Les expriences ont t ralises en laboratoire, en botes de Ptri avec une feuille de pomme de terre sur gel d'agar en prsence du puceron Myzus persicae (ad libitum). Il n'y avait pas de diffrence dans le taux de mortalit des oeufs et des nymphes entre les deux prdateurs. Toutefois, le taux de mortalit larvaire tait plus lev chez L. annulipes. Les rsultats sont discuts en fonction du potentiel d'agent de lutte biologique du chamaemyide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.009
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.543
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhytoprotectionSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207