A Circle of Women: Creating Community for Healing at Four Directions Aboriginal Student Centre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Within the Queen’s University community there are limited culturally appropriate activities for Aboriginal students. Traditionally and currently it is not common practice for an Aboriginal person to go to a stranger for guidance for personal issues. It is more common to seek guidance from a family member, community member or an elder. Aboriginal women in communities across Canada were historically valued as leaders and respected in their various roles within those societies. After colonization Aboriginal peoples were forced to adopt European patriarchal values. Consequently women were no longer allowed to hold leadership positions within their communities and the roles that they did play were perceived as less valuable. In addition to this ideological shift, the spiritual connection that women previously held with each other was disconnected through various processes. The sixties scoop and residential schools were processes that had negatively affected these relationships within Aboriginal societies. The Women’s Circle strives to bridge the disconnect that occurred and utilize time spent together during traditional activities to provide a safe place for this healing to begin. The Women’s Circle will also support Queen’s University’s mandate of engaging diversity and encouraging the Non-Aboriginal community to learn more regarding Aboriginal cultures, as well as the mandate of Four Directions Aboriginal Student Centre, specifically to foster the emotional, mental, physical and spiritual well-being of the Aboriginal Students at Queen’s University.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.037 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.015 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".