The cloning and characterization of α‐galactosidase present during and following germination of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) seed
Bibliographic record
Abstract
α‐Galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.22) is present in the embryo, micropylar and lateral endosperm of seeds of tomato during and following germination. Its activity is unchanged even when germination of the seeds is prevented by an osmoticum. It is also present in the developing and mature dry seed. A cDNA clone for tomato seed α‐galactosidase (LeaGal) has been isolated and the characteristics of the protein deduced; the predicted molecular mass of the mature enzyme is 39.8 kDa, with a pI of 4.91. The tomato α‐galactosidase has a high homology (>62%) at the amino acid level with that of other plant α‐galactosidases. A hydrophobic signal peptide region is identified which is indicative that the enzyme enters the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum during its translation, prior to its export to the protein body or cell wall, the presumed sites of its substrates. Using amino acid alignment and phylogenetic analysis, key amino acids have been identified, and relationships to other α‐galactosidases inferred. Southern hybridization analyses show that the enzyme is derived from a single gene (for which a partial sequence has been obtained) and yet there are at least three different isoforms within the seed; post‐translational modifications are thus presumed to occur. From Northern hybridization studies it is evident that α‐galactosidase transcripts are present in the lateral and micropylar endosperm during and following germination, and also to a lesser extent in the embryo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".