MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253859547 · doi:10.14740/jmc2606w

A Rare Case of Primary Angiosarcoma of Ovary in a Postmenopausal Woman

2016· article· en· W4253859547 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kazila Bhutia, Junjie Wang, Shahul Hameed Mohamed Siraj, Wai Kheong Ryan Lee, May Ying Leong, Yong Kuei Lim

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAngiosarcomaOvaryIliac fossaAbdomenAbdominal distensionDebulkingPelvisSurgeryAscitesRadiologyOvarian cancerCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary angiosarcoma of the ovary is a rare and aggressive subset accounting for less than 1% of ovarian malignancies. We present a rare case of primary angiosarcoma of the ovary in a 52-year-old healthy postmenopausal woman who presented with mild abdominal pain, distension and poor appetite of 1 week duration. On abdominal examination, right iliac fossa fullness with shifting dullness was noted. A CT of abdomen and pelvis revealed a right 10.5 cm complex solid cystic mass with ascites and peritoneal nodularity. Her CA125 was 560 U/mL. She subsequently underwent full surgical staging and optimal debulking surgery. Final histology confirmed angiosarcoma of ovary grade 3 FIGO stage IIA ovarian cancer. A repeat CT of abdomen and pelvis done 4 weeks later prior to starting chemotherapy showed large 6.5 × 6 cm pelvic peritoneal deposits with cystic septation and solid components. Her disease progressed despite palliative chemotherapy and she unfortunately passed away several months after surgery. We reiterate that primary angiosarcoma of the ovary is an aggressive tumor with poor prognosis despite optimal surgical treatment. J Med Cases. 2016;7(9):393-395 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jmc2606w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicVascular Tumors and AngiosarcomasFrench-language works237,207