MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253916036 · doi:10.1109/access.2015.2400835

IEEE Access The journal for rapid open access publishing

2015· article· en· W4253916036 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicAcademic Publishing and Open Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversität Duisburg-EssenNational Cheng Kung UniversityUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaZhejiang UniversityHarbin Institute of TechnologyDalhousie UniversityDeakin UniversityUniversity of Technology SydneyUniversidade de LisboaUniversity of DenverNanyang Technological UniversityBeihang UniversityPolitecnico di TorinoUniversidad de ZaragozaUlster UniversityUniversity of WindsorWest Virginia UniversityNational Taiwan UniversityAuburn UniversityShandong UniversityShenzhen UniversityRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteAir Force Institute of TechnologyJohns Hopkins UniversityAdvanced Digital Sciences CenterGuangdong University of Petrochemical TechnologyHaute école Spécialisée de Suisse OccidentaleSeagate TechnologyDartmouth CollegeSuranaree University of TechnologyUniversity of LouisvilleUniversity of California, DavisArizona State UniversityIowa State UniversityTexas Tech UniversityMississippi State UniversityUniversity of Notre DameSimon Fraser UniversityNorth Dakota State University
KeywordsComputer sciencePublishingOpen access journalOpen access publishingWorld Wide WebComputer networkMEDLINEPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presents a listing of the IEEE Access Editorial Board, Associate Editors, and IEEE staff and personnel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.053
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.573

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.053
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0220.009
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1710.172

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.570
GPT teacher head0.560
Teacher spread0.010 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicAcademic Publishing and Open AccessFrench-language works237,207