Bibliographic record
Abstract
1 of the African Journal of Legal Studies ("AJLS").This issue contains two articles.The first article entitled "Property Restitution Laws in a Post-War Context: The Case of Mozambique" by Professor Jon Unruh, an anthropologist from McGill University, implicitly challenges legal professionals and other practitioners to be more attentive to important property rights issues in contemporary post-conflict situations.For curiously, the place of property in a post-conflict dispensation, especially land ownership, restitution and expropriation which often form part of the litany of individual and group grievances that escalate social tension or lead to war in the first place, are largely ignored in the literature on post-conflict societies.For instance, in Zimbabwe, the thorny issue of land redistribution did not receive much attention in the immediate post-independence period, but has resurfaced as one of the outstanding questions in that country.It is perhaps crucial for countries with similar historic trajectory in the region such as South Africa and Namibia to take cue from the inherent challenges of failing to deal with land restitution in a timely fashion; since it would remain a potential minefield that could implode at a time when these countries are least prepared for the consequences.To date, the issue of land redistribution has not gained prominence in the literature on post-conflict societies.This may partly be because it is now fashionable for scholars to engage in largely intractable moral and philosophical debates about justice versus peace, or peace versus justice, understood in the narrow sense of truth commissions versus individual criminal accountability mechanisms.It appears as though both or either of these institutions are now mandatory on any credible postconflict peace physician's prescription.Indeed, relatively few writers appear to be interested in mundane questions about social injustice, or social justice, in respect of property rights and their possible implications for the cessation of hostilities and solidification of the often fragile peace in post-war environments.Yet, as Unruh ably demonstrates through his Mozambique case study, the restoration and durability of peace and economic growth in the painful aftermath of conflict and mass atrocity may well depend upon how successfully governments and the international community factor in the social context when establishing restitution regimes to redress actual or perceived historic wrongs regarding property rights.The second article, Professor John Mubangizi's "The Protection of Human Rights in Uganda: Public Awareness and Perceptions", highlights from the findings of a survey conducted in Uganda, how in the particular context of human rights law, "knowledge of the law is not only important for protection and enforcement of rights, but also for people to have some knowledge of the human rights obligations imposed on them by law" (167).He suggests that effective realization of human rights in any i Downloaded from Brill.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.260 | 0.101 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".