MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Editorial

2005· editorial· en· W4253976711 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAfrican Journal of Legal Studies · 2005
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican studies and sociopolitical issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRestitutionRedistribution (election)ExpropriationTransitional justicePolitical scienceLawSociologyLootingAccountabilityEconomic JusticePolitical economyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1 of the African Journal of Legal Studies ("AJLS").This issue contains two articles.The first article entitled "Property Restitution Laws in a Post-War Context: The Case of Mozambique" by Professor Jon Unruh, an anthropologist from McGill University, implicitly challenges legal professionals and other practitioners to be more attentive to important property rights issues in contemporary post-conflict situations.For curiously, the place of property in a post-conflict dispensation, especially land ownership, restitution and expropriation which often form part of the litany of individual and group grievances that escalate social tension or lead to war in the first place, are largely ignored in the literature on post-conflict societies.For instance, in Zimbabwe, the thorny issue of land redistribution did not receive much attention in the immediate post-independence period, but has resurfaced as one of the outstanding questions in that country.It is perhaps crucial for countries with similar historic trajectory in the region such as South Africa and Namibia to take cue from the inherent challenges of failing to deal with land restitution in a timely fashion; since it would remain a potential minefield that could implode at a time when these countries are least prepared for the consequences.To date, the issue of land redistribution has not gained prominence in the literature on post-conflict societies.This may partly be because it is now fashionable for scholars to engage in largely intractable moral and philosophical debates about justice versus peace, or peace versus justice, understood in the narrow sense of truth commissions versus individual criminal accountability mechanisms.It appears as though both or either of these institutions are now mandatory on any credible postconflict peace physician's prescription.Indeed, relatively few writers appear to be interested in mundane questions about social injustice, or social justice, in respect of property rights and their possible implications for the cessation of hostilities and solidification of the often fragile peace in post-war environments.Yet, as Unruh ably demonstrates through his Mozambique case study, the restoration and durability of peace and economic growth in the painful aftermath of conflict and mass atrocity may well depend upon how successfully governments and the international community factor in the social context when establishing restitution regimes to redress actual or perceived historic wrongs regarding property rights.The second article, Professor John Mubangizi's "The Protection of Human Rights in Uganda: Public Awareness and Perceptions", highlights from the findings of a survey conducted in Uganda, how in the particular context of human rights law, "knowledge of the law is not only important for protection and enforcement of rights, but also for people to have some knowledge of the human rights obligations imposed on them by law" (167).He suggests that effective realization of human rights in any i Downloaded from Brill.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2600.101

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAfrican Journal of Legal StudiesSame topicAfrican studies and sociopolitical issuesFrench-language works237,207