Microphysical features of typhoon and non-typhoon rainfall observed in Taiwan, an island in the northwest Pacific
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. The microphysical features of the typhoon (TY) and non-typhoon (NTY) rainfall in summer seasons are analyzed using long-term (2004 to 2016) data from the impact disdrometer installed in north Taiwan. The RSD stratified based on rainfall rate showed distinct RSD characteristics between TY and NTY rainfall. More (less) number of small (big) size raindrops are noticed in TY rainfall than NTY rainfall. RSD features in terms of gamma parameters are studied for these two weather regimes. The mass-weighted mean diameter (Dm) values are higher in NTY than TY rainfall, and an inverse behavior is observed for the normalized intercept parameter (Nw). Even after separating the rainfall regimes into convective and stratiform type, a large Dm is found in NTY compared to TY precipitation. Distinct variations in Z–R, Dm–R, Nw–R, KE–R, and KE–Dm relations are noticed between TY and NTY rainfall. Possible mechanisms responsible for the RSD variations between TY and NTY are discussed using reanalysis, remote-sensing, and ground-based radar datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".