MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254024765 · doi:10.4997/jrcpe.2019.1

Who lives in Scotland’s care homes? Descriptive analysis using routinely collected social care data 2012–16

2019· paratext· en· W4254024765 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh · 2019
Typeparatext
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroductionBetween 2 and 5% of the older adult population worldwide receive 24-hour care in an institutional long-term setting. 1 The UK care home population has been comparatively underrepresented in research, including that using administrative data. 2 Care homes in the UK do not typically use the large international care data systems, 3 such as the Inter-RAI (international resident assessment instrument) 4 and Minimum Dataset (MDS). 5These data systems collect multidomain assessments about residents and have provided a rich repository for research in the USA, Canada and across Europe.Knowledge about UK care home residents, therefore, comes from survey data, 6 longitudinal cohort studies 7,8 or from recruited participants in intervention studies. 9,10Both the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study and English Longitudinal Study of Ageing have reported data on care home residents in UK care homes; totalling 543 and 303 residents, respectively. 7,8Individual studies have yielded valuable in-depth data characterising residents, but again are limited by small numbers of residents in relatively few homes, with 227 residents from 11 care homes included from a single region represented in the most cited UK care home cohort data. 11The challenges of research in the care home sector are well described, including issues around capacity Background Adults living in long-term care are a signi cant and complex population who are under-represented in research using traditional methodologies.Methods The aim of this study was to provide the rst description of the adult care home population and their homes, using routinely collected data.A retrospective descriptive analysis was performed using the Scottish Care Home Census (SCHC) between 1 April 2012 and 31 March 2016.Results Data are from 1,299 care home services (79.3-89.7%completeness), including 34,399-39,311 residents per year across all regions of Scotland.A total of 68% of residents are female, with median age 84 years.27% fund their own care.Over 85% of self-funded residents receive free personal care allowance.Around 60% require care from a registered nurse and 49% have a formal diagnosis of dementia.The majority of admissions come from hospital (46%).Between 13 and 17% of residents die annually, with a median time to death of 596-653 days.Conclusions This study provides the most comprehensive descriptive data of UK care home residents available.There is scope to enhance the information available through linkage to other routine sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0080.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of EdinburghFrench-language works237,207