MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254122972 · doi:10.1386/bsr.17.187/5

Book Reviews

2012· article· en· W4254122972 on OpenAlexaff
Chelsea Horton, William P. Collins, Graham Hassall, Daniel Grolin, Kavian S. Milani

Bibliographic record

VenueBaha i Studies Review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion and Society Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisionRevelationGeorge (robot)Religious studiesSociologyArt historyMedia studiesArtTheologyPhilosophyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transnational Transcendence: Essays on Religion and Globalization, Thomas J. Csordas (ed.), (2009) Berkeley: University of California Press, ix + 338 pp., ill., 23 cm., ISBN 9780520257429 (pbk), $24.95; ISBN 9780520257412 (hbk), $60.00 Commonalities: A Positive Look at Latter-day Saints from a Bahá’í Perspective, Serge van Neck, (2009) Oxford: George Ronald, xvii + 445 pp., 24 cm., ISBN 9780853985372 (pbk), £19.95/$38.95 Lines that Connect: Rethinking Pattern and Mind in the Pacific, Graeme Were, (2010) Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, x + 204 pp., 44 ill., 24 cm., ISBN 9780824833848 (hbk), $38.00 Religious Myths and Visions of America: How Minority Faiths Redefined America’s World Role, Christopher Buck, (2009) Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, xii + 324 pp., 25 cm., ISBN 9780313359590 (hbk), $49.95 Revelation & Social Reality: Learning to Translate What is Written into Reality, Paul Lample (2009) West Palm Beach, FL: Palabra, vii + 293 pp., 23 cm., ISBN 9781890101701 (pbk) $10.00. Digital download www.palabrapublications.com

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.591
Threshold uncertainty score0.584

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5910.528

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.171
GPT teacher head0.490
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBaha i Studies ReviewSame topicReligion and Society InteractionsFrench-language works237,207