MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Update in Infectious Diseases

2006· article· en· W4254433761 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bennett Lorber

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Internal Medicine · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Media in Health Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)Internal medicinePublic healthTuberculosisFamily medicineIntensive care medicineDiseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Updates5 September 2006Update in Infectious DiseasesBennett Lorber, MDBennett Lorber, MDFrom Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Author, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-145-5-200609050-00008 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail This Update in Infectious Diseases focuses on 3 main topics: emerging and reemerging infections, public health and preventive medicine, and therapeutics. In the area of emerging and reemerging infections, important papers in 2005 shed new light on disease caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, respiratory syncytial virus, Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea, and influenza. There were new findings in the area of public health and preventive medicine regarding the treatment of recurrent sexually transmitted infections and the radiographic appearance of tuberculosis. Papers in therapeutics addressed the use of intrapleural streptokinase for pleural effusion and antibiotic prophylaxis for neutropenic patients. Changes to clinical practice ...Reference1. Knight CL, Fihn SD. Update in general internal medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:52-61. [PMID: 16818929] LinkGoogle Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: From Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Disclosures: Honoraria: Merck.Corresponding Author: Bennett Lorber, MD, Section of Infectious Diseases, Temple University Hospital, Broad and Ontario Streets, Philadelphia, PA 19140; e-mail, bennett.[email protected]edu. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoRadiographic Appearance of Primary Tuberculosis Julio A. Leey and W. Paul McKinney Metrics Cited byAnti-Haemophilus Activity of Selected Essential Oils Detected by TLC-Direct Bioautography and Biofilm InhibitionBioArena system for studying key molecules as well as ingredients in biological samplesBioassay-Guided Isolation and Identification of Antimicrobial Compounds from Thyme Essential Oil by Means of Overpressured Layer Chromatography, Bioautography and GC–MSForced-flow planar liquid chromatographic techniques (after twenty-two years)Molecular characteristics of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains for clinical medicineCurrent Diagnostic Tools for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus InfectionsThe Enduring Menace of MRSA: Incidence, Treatment, and Prevention in a County JailBioArena: An unlimited possibility of biochemical interactions in the adsorbent layer after chromatographic separationClostridium difficile colitis that fails conventional metronidazole therapy: response to nitazoxanideRadiographic Appearance of Primary TuberculosisJulio A. Leey, MD and W. Paul McKinney, MDUpdate in Hospital MedicinePreetha Basaviah, MD and Shaun Frost, MD 5 September 2006Volume 145, Issue 5Page: 354-360KeywordsAntibiotic prophylaxisAntibioticsChlamydia infectionEndocarditisGonorrheaHospitalizationsInfectious diseasesMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusSexually transmitted diseases ePublished: 5 September 2006 Issue Published: 5 September 2006 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2006 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0080.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1290.084

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Internal MedicineSame topicSocial Media in Health EducationFrench-language works237,207