MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254455001 · doi:10.1109/tmag.2020.2965225

IEEE Transactions on Magnetics publication information

2020· article· en· W4254455001 on OpenAlexaff
Masahiro Yamaguchi, Manuel Ázquez, Peter Lau, Hans Fischer, Simon Nembach, Teruo Greaves, Mathias Ono, Thomas Kl Äui, Elke Arenholz, Katsuji Nakagawa, David Jiles, Johannes Paulides, Olga Kazakova, G. Reiß, Nicoleta Lupu, Shinji Yuasa, Hendrik Jean, Anne Incorvia, Lucian Prejbeanu, G. V. Kurlyandskaya, Montserrat Rivas, K. Nakamura, Yukiko Takahashi, J. Faßbender, Distinguished Lecturers, Bethanie Stadler Conference, Rudolf Sch, Äfer Education, Brian Finance, Mark Membership, Hans Nominations, Yamaguchi Bylaws, Ron Publications, Philip Publicity, Oksana Chapters, Mingzhong Wu, Atsufumi Hirohata, Dario Albertini, Elke Arena, Davide Arenholz, James Bossini, Andrii Chang, Cindi Chumak, Peter Dennis, Marcelo Fischer, Donald Knobel, Kannan Gardner, Cristina Krishnan, Laura Ómez-Polo, Shikha Lewis, Nicoleta Jain, Mark Lupu, Markus Kief, Mathias Ünzenberg, Äui Kl, Ikenna Cajetan, Philip Nlebedim, Dan Pong, Raju Wei, John Ramanujan, Jordi Xiao, V Jordi Sort, Sachiko Ñas, Anjan Yamaguchi, Jinbo Soumyanarayanan, Plamen Yang, Wei Stamenov, Nian Zhang, Barry Sun, Ron Goldfarb, Petru Andrei, R. H. Victora, Toshio Fukuda, Susan Kathy, Land, Kathleen Kramer, Joseph Lillie, Márcio das Chagas Moura, Stephen Phillips, Kakali Sarkar, Kukjin Chun, Robert Fish, James Conrad, John Verboncoeur, Stephen Welby, Thomas Siegert, Business Administration, Julie Cozin, Corporate Governance, Donna Hourican, Jamie Moesch, Sophia Muirhead, Chris Brantley, Ieee-Usa Cherif, Karen Hawkins, Cecelia Jankowski, Geographic Activities, Michael Förster

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsCanadian Standards Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceElectrical engineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score0.713

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5000.269

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MagneticsSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207