MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254542080 · doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e31824bed1c

In Response

2012· article· en· W4254542080 on OpenAlexaffabout
J. Anns, Imad T. Awad

Bibliographic record

VenueAnesthesia & Analgesia · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFacial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInguinal ligamentNeurovascular bundleBody mass indexAnatomyCadaverInguinal canalFemoral nerveSurgeryGroinInguinal herniaPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vandepitte et al. raise several points1 that we discuss individually: first, we standardized the needle insertion point at the inguinal crease and measured the distance from the surface marking of the inguinal ligament to the needle insertion point at the inguinal crease. The mean distance was approximately 4 cm.2 In addition, the needle was inserted perpendicular to the skin in all cases. We chose the inguinal crease as the insertion point because of a cadaver study demonstrating that the femoral nerve is most superficial and broadest at this level.3 Our findings support a recent study published by Nader et al.4 in which the ultrasound probe was placed over the inguinal crease and, with the use of a stimulator needle, was able to stimulate the branch to quadriceps by angling the needle tip laterally in 96% of cases and similarly angling medially, the branch to sartorius was stimulated in 94% of cases. Second, Vandepitte et al. suggest that we exclude patients with unpredictable anatomy (obese patients); however, we excluded patients with a body mass index of >35, which is defined by the World Health Organization as Obese Class II; indeed, the World Health Organization classifies a person with a body mass index >30 as obese. We feel therefore that obese patients were not entirely excluded from our study. Also, we are unaware of any study that addresses an unpredictable relationship between obesity and the femoral neurovascular bundle or the distance between the inguinal ligament and the inguinal crease. Furthermore, in the studies that the authors quoted in which there is an unpredictable relationship between obesity and the neurovascular bundle, there was no mention of body habitus.3,5 Thus, we agree with Vandepitte et al. that if the insertion point was distal to the femoral artery bifurcation, eliciting only a sartorius response could result in potential failure of the block. Therefore, accepting quadriceps motor evoked twitch as an endpoint of stimulation in obese patients cannot be confirmed until this theory is addressed with a proper clinical trial. Jonathan Anns, FRCA Imad T. Awad, FCA (RCSI) Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario, Canada [email protected]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnesthesia & AnalgesiaSame topicFacial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207