Delayed tendon reattachment does not reverse atrophy and fat accumulation of the supraspinatus — an experimental study in rabbits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Muscle atrophy and fat accumulation occur after rotator cuff tearing. Whether these changes are reversible after a successful repair is still unknown. Imaging allows only a semi-quantitative assessment of muscle atrophy and fat deposition. As only experimental studies permit a quantification of both, a unilateral detachment and wrapping in a polyvinylidine fluoride membrane of the supraspinatus was done in 22 rabbits. After 12 weeks, the polyvinylidine fluoride membrane was removed in 10 rabbits and the tendon inserted into a bony trough. The opposite shoulder served as control. All rabbits were killed at 24 weeks. Accumulation of fat on the muscle surface as well as between the muscle fascicles and occasionally in the sarcoplasm was increased in both experimental groups when compared to controls (non-reattached 12.8%, reattached 23.5% vs controls 5.4%; all p < 0.005). The muscle atrophy was significant (non-reattached 9.2 ml, reattached 9.1 ml vs controls 10.7 ml; both p < 0.005). Neither atrophy nor fat accumulation were reversed by surgical reattachment of the supraspinatus tendon. On the contrary, the fat accumulation was higher in the reattached group (p < 0.005). The trauma of reattachment, the delay between detachment and reattachment or an insufficient duration of recovery may have contributed to both, the lack of reversibility of supraspinatus atrophy and fat accumulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".