Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Ci.tro.mi.cro'bi.um. Gr. n. citron citron; Gr. adj. micros small; Gr. n. bios life; M.L. n. Citromicrobium citron‐colored microbe. Cells are pleomorphic , depending on the growth phase of cultures , coccoid to ovoid rods , often forming Y‐cells . Motile by one polar or subpolar flagellum. Gram negative , highly variable in its mode of multiplication . Cultures are intensely lemon‐yellow colored because of carotenoid pigments , and contain bacteriochlorophyll a . Photosynthetic apparatus contains reaction center ( RC ) and light harvesting ( LH ) complexes . No growth occurs anaerobically in the light . Incapable of autotrophic growth. Obligately aerobic . No dissimilatory denitrification activity detected. The habitat is marine. The mol % G + C of the DNA is : 67.5. Type species : “ Citromicrobium bathyomarinum ” Yurkov, Krieger, Stackebrandt and Beatty 1999, 4523. Taxonomic and Nomenclature Notes According to the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN), the taxonomic status of the genus Citromicrobium is: preferred name (not correct name) (last update, February 2025) * . LPSN classification: Bacteria / Pseudomonadati / Pseudomonadota / Alphaproteobacteria / Sphingomonadales / Sphingomonadaceae / Citromicrobium The genus Citromicrobium can also be recovered in the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) as g__Alteriqipengyuania (version v220) ** . GTDB classification: d__Bacteria / p__Pseudomonadota / c__Alphaproteobacteria / o__Sphingomonadales / f__Sphingomonadaceae / g__Alteriqipengyuania * Meier‐Kolthoff et al. ( 2022 ). Nucleic Acids Res , 50 , D801 – D807 ; DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab902 ** Parks et al. ( 2022 ). Nucleic Acids Res , 50 , D785 – D794 ; DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab776
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.213 | 0.217 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".