MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254850233 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14663319

Developing an Approach to Quantify Nurse Workload and Quality of Care Using Discrete Event Simulation

2021· preprint· en· W4254850233 on OpenAlexafffund
Sadeem Munawar Qureshi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWorkloadNursingIntraclass correlationDiscrete event simulationQuality (philosophy)Multidisciplinary approachMedicineOperations managementComputer scienceSimulationPsychometricsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intensive workload for nurses due to high demands directly impacts the quality of care and nurses’ health. To better manage workload, it is necessary to understand the drivers of workload. This multidisciplinary research provides an adaptable nurse-focused approach to discrete event simulation (DES) modelling that can quantify the effects of changing technical design and operational policies in terms of nurse workload and quality of care. In the first phase of this research, a demonstrator model was developed that explored the impact of nurse-patient ratios. As the number of patients per nurse (nurse-patient ratio) increased, nurse workload increased, and the quality of care deteriorated. In the second phase of this research, the DES model tested the interaction of patient acuity and nurse-patient ratios. As the levels of patient acuity and number of patients per nurse increased, nurse workload increased, and quality of care deteriorated – a result that was not surprising but an ability to quantify this proactively, was conceived. In the third phase of this research, the DES model was validated by means of an external field validation study by adapting the model to a real-world unit. The DES model showed excellent consistency between modelling and real-world outcomes (Intraclass iv Correlation Coefficient = 0.85 to 0.99; Spearman Rank-order Correlation Coefficient = 0.78). The fourth phase of this research used the validated simulation model to test the design implication of geographical patient bed assignment. As nurses were assigned to patient beds further away from the center of the unit or spread further apart, nurse workload increased as the nurse had to walk more leading to a deterioration in the quality of care. The DES modelling capability showed that both aspects of assignment were important for patient bed assignment. The fifth phase of this research combined Digital Human Modelling (DHM) and DES to produce a time-trace of biomechanical load and peak biomechanical load (‘activity’) for a full shift of nursing work. As the nurse was assigned to beds further away from the center of the unit, the cumulative biomechanical load decreased as the nurse spent more time walking yielding a reduced biomechanical load in comparison to the task group ‘activity’. As patient acuity is increased, a decrease in L4/L5 moment is observed as the task duration and frequency of most care task increase. Due to increased care demands, nurses must now spend more time delivering care. Since the care demands are much higher than the current capability of nurses, quality of care is deteriorated. As number of patients per nurse, increased a ‘ceiling’ effect on biomechanical load can be observed as nurses do not have the time to attend to this extra demand for care. The use of this adaptable DES modeling approach can assist decision makers by providing quantifiable information on the potential impact of these decisions on nurse workload and quality of care. Thereby, assisting decision makers to create technical design and operational policies for hospital units that do not compromise patient safety and health of nurses. Keywords: Behavioural operations research; Discrete Event Simulation; Nurse Workload; Quality of care; Healthcare Ergonomics; Human Factors Engineering; Nurses; Healthcare policy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.947

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.371
GPT teacher head0.571
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHealthcare Operations and Scheduling OptimizationFrench-language works237,207