MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4254867569 · doi:10.1093/pch/20.5.e68a

95: Golden Hour Management Practices for Infants <32 Wks Gestational Age in Canada

2015· article· en· W4254867569 on OpenAlexaffabout
Vibhuti Shah, Mary Seshia, M Dunn, G Schmölzer

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeonatal intensive care unitNeonatologyGestational agePediatricsFamily medicinePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Care practices during neonatal transition can significantly impact both short- and long-term neonatal outcomes. The Evidence-based Practice for Improving Quality (EPIQ) II study was initiated in 2009 with the goal of improving neonatal outcomes (results in CMAJ 2014, 186:E485–94). As part of the study, the EPIQ Golden Hour Committee focused on transitional care (TC) practices in the first hour after birth, including use of the 2010 NRP recommendations for immediate management of preterm infants. Determine the current management practices during the Golden Hour for infants of <32 weeks GA in Canadian NICUs. A survey was emailed to all EPIQ II site investigators and/or co-ordinators in August 2014 with two monthly reminders. The survey included questions on unit characteristics, antenatal management, composition of the TC team, and management in the first hour after birth. The responses to the questions were categorized into four GA groups: 230/7–236/7 wks, 240/7–256/7 wks, 260/7–276/7 wks, and 280/7–316/7 wks. Of the 23 EPIQ II NICUs that were perinatal centers, 13 (56%) completed the survey. Eight sites had >15 level III NICU beds. Antenatal counseling was provided >75% of the time by 92% and 77% of units for GA <28 and 28 to 316/7 wks, respectively. A neonatal fellow or neonatologist/paediatrican was mostly responsible for counseling. 92% did not have a structured template for counseling although one-half used decision aids. The TC team consisted of three or more individuals for stabilization of infants of <28 wks GA and neonatologists were present in 92% of the units, this varied according to the time of the day. 77% of units practiced DCC, 100% used thermal wrap to maintain temperature, the initial FiO2 ranged from 21–40%, and 100% followed the NRP recommended oxygen saturation guide. In spontaneously breathing infants, CPAP was the initial mode of ventilatory support. Prophylactic surfactant was administered by 31% of units for <26 wk GA infants. Infants of <24 wks GA were most likely to be intubated and ventilated. Umbilical venous and arterial catheters were used by 92% for infants of 24 wks GA. Most units did not measure sound levels or offer skin-to-skin contact in the delivery room. Most Canadian NICUs practice NRP recommendations for preterm infants. DCC, thermal wrap, non-invasive ventilation, and FiO2 of <40% are used during the first hour after birth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→