MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254887511 · doi:10.1039/b402482f

Arsenic speciation in marine certified reference materials

2004· article· en· W4254887511 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical chemistry methods development
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArsenobetaineCertified reference materialsArsenateChemistryExtraction (chemistry)ChromatographyArsenicAcetic acidSolventDetection limitBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study describes the analysis of arsenicals in three marine based certified reference materials (CRMs), DORM-2, DOLT-2 and TORT-2, all produced by the National Research Council of Canada. Extraction protocols involving accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) and sonication were investigated and arsenicals were determined on-line by anion-exchange and cation-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The major species in all three tissues was found to be arsenobetaine (AsB), corresponding to 90%, 67% and 73% of the water-soluble arsenic in DORM-2, DOLT-2 and TORT-2, respectively. Other species quantified were arsenocholine (AsC+), tetramethylarsonium ion (TMAs+), trimethylarsonioproprionate (TMAP), dimethylarsenic acid (DMA), monomethylarsenic acid (MMA), arsenosugar D (As-sug D), arsenate (AsV) and arsenosugar A (As-sug A). The major species detected in all three materials were AsB and DMA, which together accounted for 97.4% (DORM-2), 95.4% (DOLT-2) and 91.7% (TORT-2) of the sum of the water soluble As species. The agreement for the determination of AsB by the different methods was good for all three materials, whereas some discrepancy was evident in the results for DMA. When an ASE approach with 50% acetic acid in methanol was used for the extraction, between 22% (DOLT-2) and 58% (TORT-2) more DMA was determined compared with extraction by sonication with water. Some discrepancy was evident between the sum of the species extracted and both the total As determined in the extracts and the certified As content based on complete digestion of the materials. The sum of the species recovered by sonication corresponded to 84% (DOLT-2) to 94% (DORM-2) of the total As determined in the aqueous extract. In comparison with the certified As content of the three materials, the sums of the extracted species range from 46% (DOLT-2) to 76% (TORT-2) and 102% (DORM-2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it