MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4254923391 · doi:10.1161/circ.135.suppl_1.p144

Abstract P144: Being Born Small for Gestational Age and Later Cardiac Structure and Function in Adolescence

2017· article· en· W4254923391 on OpenAlexaff
Simon Timpka, Alun D. Hughes, Nish Chaturvedi, Paul W. Franks, Debbie A. Lawlor, Abigail Fraser

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsFraser Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSmall for gestational ageGestational ageBirth weightPregnancyPercentileConfidence intervalCohortObstetricsLow birth weightCardiologyPediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Evidence suggests that impaired fetal growth is associated with increased risks of ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and stroke. Less is known about the potential association between low birth weight (small for gestational age; SGA) and cardiac structure and function later in life. Methods: 1,592 participants (54% females) from a UK birth cohort were examined with echocardiography at mean age 17.7 years (SD 0.3). Using regression models we investigated the association between being born SGA and adolescent cardiac structure and function; left ventricular mass indexed to height 2.7 (LVMI), relative wall thickness (RWT), left atrial size indexed to height 2.7 , ejection fraction, s’, and E/e’. Birth weight Z-score (by gestational week and sex) was defined according to an external reference based on UK data from the same time period as the births of the participants. SGA was defined as Z-score ≤5th percentile. Birth weight was also analyzed using linear splines with predefined knots at the 5 th , 50 th and 95 th percentile to allow for potential non-linearity in associations. Main models were adjusted for age, sex and several maternal factors: height, pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational diabetes, gestational week at birth, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, smoking, and education. Results: Adolescents born SGA had smaller LVMI (-2.12 g/m 2.7 ; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) -3.69 to -0.55). SGA was also associated with greater mean ejection fraction (2.24, 95% CI 0.62 to 3.87) compared to non-SGA adolescents. In the linear spline analyses, we observed a positive increase in LVMI per one unit increase in birth weight Z-score among those born SGA (3.56 g/m 2.7 , 95% CI 0.95 to 6.17) and a negative change of slope in the next interval (birth weight between 5 th and 50 th percentile, p=0.02). There was no support for any associations between SGA, including the spline analyses, and the other outcomes (RWT, left atrial size indexed to height 2.7 , s’, and E/e’). The association between SGA and left ventricular mass was evident also without indexing for body size, and when indexing by body surface area or (height in m) 1.6 . Conclusion: Being born SGA appears to be associated with certain aspects of cardiac structure and function in adolescence, which later in life predict the development of clinical heart disease. Smaller left ventricular mass in adolescence might predispose those born SGA to be more susceptible to adverse cardiac remodeling later in life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicBirth, Development, and Health→French-language works237,207→