Selective isolation and study on the global distribution of the genus <i>Planobispora</i> in soils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Planobispora strains, including the type strain, produced abundant sporangia on humic acid vitamin gellan gum medium when more than 50 colonies grew on a plate. However, these strains did not produce sporangia on the aerial mycelium, a diagnostic characteristic of this genus, when fewer than 20 colonies grew on a plate. Trace salts, such as FeSO4·7H2O, MnCl2·4H2O, ZnSO4·7H2O, and NiSO4·6H2O, stimulated sporangium formation of Planobispora strains. Better sporangium formation of Planobispora strains was observed on the humic acid trace salts gellan gum medium at pH 9.0 than at neutral pH. Moreover, an alkaline medium repressed the growth of three out of six Streptomyces strains so that this condition was effective for selective isolation of Planobispora strains. An alkaline flooding solution of skim milk, five antimicrobial agents, and dry heat treatment at 90°C for 60 min were effective for selective isolation. Using these techniques, we examined the distribution of Planobispora strains by using 1467 soil samples collected from Japan and other parts of the world. One hundred and nineteen Planobispora strains were isolated from 51 soil samples (3.5% of the samples tested) that were collected in Ecuador, Egypt, French Guiana, India, and Madagascar. Planobispora strains were recovered only in tropical and subtropical soils. To our knowledge, this is the first record that Planobispora strains have been isolated from locations other than Venezuela, Namibia, or South Africa.Key words: Planobispora, gellan gum, selective isolation, actinomycete, distribution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".