Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
VenueCold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryNational Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Cancer InstituteNational Research Council CanadaSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of California, San FranciscoUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraSchool of Medicine, Stanford UniversityDirectorate for Biological SciencesNational Institutes of HealthPfizerUniversity of California, Los AngelesStockholms UniversitetHebrew University of JerusalemHirosaki UniversityUniversität BielefeldDepartment of Biotechnology, Government of West BengalMedizinische Universität WienAlnylam PharmaceuticalsUniversité de LiègeOhio State UniversityUniversité de MontréalUniversity of PittsburghTel Aviv UniversitySolar Energy Technologies OfficeLunds UniversitetUniversität WienInha UniversityUniversity of UlsanRIKENUniversiteit van AmsterdamBeckman Research Institute, City of HopeMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterWellcome TrustCancer Research UKUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillHarvard UniversityPTC TherapeuticsMcGill UniversityMassachusetts General HospitalUniversity of MinnesotaCase Western Reserve UniversityNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesSt. Jude Children's Research HospitalSchool of Medicine, University of ConnecticutUniversity of ConnecticutJapan Science and Technology AgencyVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityAmgenUniversity of PennsylvaniaNovartis Institutes for BioMedical ResearchMassachusetts Institute of TechnologySeoul National UniversityYale UniversityUppsala UniversitetRigshospitaletJohns Hopkins UniversityPrinceton University
KeywordsSpring (device)Quantitative biologyVolume (thermodynamics)OceanographyBiologyComputational biologyGeologyPhysicsThermodynamics
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexRegulatory RNAs” was the theme of the 71st annual Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology, where scientists from around the world presented the latest advances in the biology of RNAs, including RNA interference, transcriptional and translational control, RNA editing, and the role of RNAs in biological circuits and epigenetic events. Investigators discussed the latest technologies aimed at large-scale characterization of RNAs, as well as the roles of small RNAs in development and cancer. This volume is a timely survey of this important new area of molecular biology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
