MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

List of Contributors

2014· other· en· W4255158359 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in media and communications · 2014
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Media and Visual Art
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary sciencePublishingChapelState (computer science)Media studiesSociologyHistoryPolitical scienceArt historyLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Citation (2014), "List of Contributors", Communication and Information Technologies Annual (Studies in Media and Communications, Vol. 8), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. ix-x. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020140000008008 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2014 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Debashis ‘Deb’ Aikat School of Journalism and Mass Communication, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA Renee Bourdeaux Department of Communication, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA Coye Cheshire School of Information, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA Shelia R. Cotten Department of Media and Information, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA Julia Crouse Waddell University of Arkansas at Monticello, Monticello, AR, USA Elizabeth L. Davison Department of Sociology, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA Nancy DiTunnariello Department of Communication, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA Erhardt Graeff Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA, USA Airi Lampinen Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and School of Information, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA Robert LaRose Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA Vilma Lehtinen Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Helsinki, Finland and Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Christoph Lutz Institute for Media and Communications Management, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland Caitlin McLaughlin Bishop’s University, Sherbrooke, Canada Miriam Meckel Institute for Media and Communications Management, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland Carrie Anne Platt Department of Communication, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA Giulia Ranzini Institute for Media and Communications Management, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland Nora Rifon Department of Advertising & Public Relations, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA Daniel B. Shank Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia Amanda J. Turner Department of Sociology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA Linda M. Waldron Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Social Work, Christopher Newport University, Newport News, VA, USA Brian W. Ward Center for Social Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA Christina Wirth-Hawkins Colorado Department of Education, Denver, CO, USA Book Chapters Communication and Information Technologies Annual Doing and Being Digital: Mediated Childhoods Studies in Media and Communications Communication and Information Technologies Annual Doing and Being Digital: Mediated Childhoods Copyright Page Editorial Board List of Contributors Acknowledgements Introduction: Doing and Being Digital: Mediated Childhoods Stress 2.0: Social Media Overload Among Swiss Teenagers Gradations of Disappearing Digital Divides Among Racially Diverse Middle School Students Play to Pay?: Adolescent Video Game Play & STEM Choice Should I Text or Should I Call?: How College Students Navigate Mediated Connections with Family Media Choice and Identity Work: A Case Study of Information Communication Technology Use in a Peer Community Promoting Online Safety among Adolescents: Enhancing Coping Self-Efficacy and Protective Behaviors through Enactive Mastery Hey Kids, This is Advertising: Metaphors and Promotional Appeals in Online Advertisements for Children Cyberbullying: The Social Construction of a Moral Panic Tweens, Cyberbullying, and Moral Reasoning: Separating the Upstanders from the Bystanders About the Editors About the Authors

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.789
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in media and communicationsSame topicDigital Media and Visual ArtFrench-language works237,207