MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Introduction

2000· article· en· W4255258811 on OpenAlexaff
David Bevan

Bibliographic record

VenueAnesthesia & Analgesia · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Sedative Agents
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRocuroniumNeostigmineNeuromuscular monitoringNeuromuscular BlockadeAnesthesiaNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsSugammadexMuscle relaxantNeuromuscular transmissionPropofol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rapacuronium (Raplon) is a new rapid-onset, short-acting, nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drug. It is the latest in the pancuroniun, vecuronium, pipecuronium, rocuronium series of amino-steroid drugs developed by Organon (West Orange, NJ). The purpose of this supplement is to put its pharmacological profile into perspective. The supplement will not present new studies or describe in detail the preclinical testing of the drug. Rather, it will present the general issues of onset and recovery of neuromuscular blocking, neuromuscular monitoring and reversal, pediatric differences, and cost and will discuss those areas in which the new drug’s activities differ from its predecessors. It may seem surprising that dose-response data for rapacuronium were not collected early in the evaluation process. With previous intermediate neuromuscular relaxants, such as rocuronium and cisatracurium, the 95% effective dose (ED95) was a useful variable because doses of twice the ED95 produced good intubating conditions in a reasonable period of time. The more rapid onset of rapacuronium makes such information unnecessary. Instead, dose-ranging studies were performed to determine the dose that produced good-excellent intubating conditions at 1 min. This was achieved, in adults, in a dose of 1.5 mg/kg, which is roughly equivalent to ED95 × 1.5. Another apparent difference is the ability to reverse the neuromuscular block by administering neostigmine 2 or 5 min after rapacuronium. This results in a train-of-four ratio approximately 16 min after 1.5 mg/kg rapacuronium. However, it is now recognized that such early reversal can also be achieved after rocuronium or vecuronium, but more slowly. The early reversal should be considered further evidence of the rapid recovery of rapacuronium. It will seldom be clinically useful except in those situations in which prompt restoration of ventilation is necessary. Clinicians will rapidly learn that early neostigmine administration will require careful patient observation until neuromuscular activity has been restored. Some questions remain to be answered concerning the new drug. It is metabolized to its 3-OH metabolite Org 9488 which is 2.5 times as potent a neuromuscular blocking agent than the parent compound and is cleared slowly by the kidney. Hence, there is the risk of a more prolonged block. At present, it is recommended that rapacuronium not be administered by continuous infusion or that more than 2–3 repeat doses be given. Early clinical testing reported a number of instances of “ bronchospasm” although, apparently, not accompanied by increased histamine concentrations. Further experience will be necessary to determine the true frequency and whether the response is directly the result of rapacuronium or a consequence of tracheal intubation in a lightly anesthetized, mildly paralyzed patient. The Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of rapacuronium to facilitate rapid sequence endotracheal intubation. However, anesthesiologists will require further proof of its efficacy in this situation before succinylcholine is abandoned. Nevertheless, rapacuronium appears to be the most promising nondepolarizing succinylcholine alternative to reach the clinician.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.541
Threshold uncertainty score0.771

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4590.325

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnesthesia & AnalgesiaSame topicAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsFrench-language works237,207