An Unusual Transformation of a Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor to Adenocarcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transformation of germ cell tumor to an alternate malignancy is rare; and it is believed to be secondary to teratomatous elements of the initial tumor surviving chemotherapy and subsequently proliferating. Here, we describe a patient with transformation of a nonseminomatous germ cell tumor to adenocarcinoma. A 55-year-old male with history of nonseminomatous germ cell tumor of the left testicle, previously resected, followed by four cycles of BEP chemotherapy, on active surveillance, presented nearly 20 years later with nausea and rising alpha-fetoprotein levels. Computed tomography (CT) abdomen revealed bulky retrocrural lymphadenopathy with increased fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography (PET) scan. Biopsy revealed metastatic adenocarcinoma, staining strongly positive for SALL4 and CDX2, with focal rare positivity for CK20 in the tumor cells, consistent with germ cell origin. FOLFOX therapy was therefore initiated. This is one of few documented cases showing transformation of nonseminomatous germ cell tumor to adenocarcinoma, for which surgical resection is favored as primary therapy. However, aggressive adjuvant chemotherapy may be considered and should be directed towards the most aggressive found histology. J Med Cases. 2019;10(5):123-125 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jmc3301
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".