MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255349864 · doi:10.1115/detc2015-46369

Trajectory Generation for Three-Degree-of-Freedom Cable-Suspended Parallel Robots Based on Analytical Integration of the Dynamic Equations

2015· article· en· W4255349864 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiaoling Jiang, Clément Gosselin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsWorkspaceTrajectoryControl theory (sociology)Differential equationKinematicsJacobian matrix and determinantParallel manipulatorAccelerationConstant (computer programming)MathematicsComputer scienceMathematical analysisRobotClassical mechanicsApplied mathematicsPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a trajectory generation technique for three-dof planar cable-suspended parallel robots. Based on the kinematic and dynamic modelling of the robot, positive constant ratios between cable tensions and cable lengths are assumed. This assumption allows the transformation of the dynamic equations into linear differential equations with constant coefficients for the positioning part, while the orientation equation becomes a pendulum-like differential equation for which accurate solutions can be found in the literature. The integration of the differential equations is shown to yield families of translational trajectories and associated special frequencies. This result generalizes the special cases previously identified in the literature. Combining the results obtained with translational trajectories and rotational trajectories, more general combined motions are analysed. Examples are given in order to demonstrate the results. Because of the initial assumption on which the proposed method is based, the ratio between cable forces and cable lengths is constant and hence always positive, which ensures that all cables remain under tension. Therefore, the acceleration vector remains in the column space of the Jacobian matrix, which means that the mechanism can smoothly pass through kinematic singularities. The proposed trajectory planning approach can be used to plan dynamic trajectories that extend beyond the static workspace of the mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207