MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255372135 · doi:10.1109/robot.1997.614300

Accurate position control of a pneumatic actuator using on/off solenoid valves

2002· article· en· W4255372135 on OpenAlexaff
R. B. van Varseveld, Gary M. Bone

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)SolenoidPneumatic actuatorActuatorPID controllerSolenoid valveFeed forwardServoComputer sciencePosition (finance)Controller (irrigation)Valve actuatorServomechanismRotary actuatorServomotorElectrohydraulic servo valveControl engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineeringArtificial intelligenceTemperature controlControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of a fast, accurate and inexpensive position controlled pneumatic actuator that may be applied to a variety of robotic applications is described. A novel PWM valve pulsing algorithm allowed on/off solenoid valves to be used in place of costly servo valves. A linear process model was obtained from experimental data using system identification. A PID controller with added friction compensation and position feedforward was successfully implemented. A worst case steady state accuracy of 0.21 mm was achieved with a rise time of 180 ms for step inputs from 0.11 mm to 64 mm. Following errors to 64 mm s-curve profiles were less than 2.0 mm. The controller was robust to a six fold increase in the system mass. The actuator's overall performance is comparable to that achieved by other researchers using servo valves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207